An interview
with Al Franken
By Albert Leung, Staff Writer
"We need to set room tone," Al
Franken jokes after asking one of his associates to prop
open the front door to keep the electronic ringer from
being picked up while recording. "I'm proud to say that
I'm the only politician that will remind people to set
their room tone before recording."
Yes, Al Franken is a politician and he's running for
U.S. Senator in Minnesota. No, that's not a joke so no
need to wait for a punch line. The St. Louis Park-native
is serious in his campaign against Republican-incumbent,
Norm Coleman.
While Greg Hugh, publisher, Will Ahern, director of
marketing communications, our videographer and I waited
for Franken to emerge from the depths of his
headquarters located off of University Ave. SE in St.
Paul. His offices are unexpectedly casual, with a simple
set up. No outlandish furniture, fancy gizmos or
hoity-toity decorations one might expect a celebrity to
outfit their workplace with. Definitely not what may be
expected from a celebrity satirist, radio host and
former-Saturday Night Live writer.
The three of us China Insight staffers were given the
opportunity to meet with Franken to discuss issues
concerning the Chinese American community. Franken
strolls out, coffee mug in hand wearing a blue shirt,
dark blue suit and blue tie. He's also wearing his
trademark circular-shaped spectacles and a big grin.
Walking towards us to greet us, as if unable to resist
his natural comedic bravado that has helped him pioneer
a career as a Saturday Night Live writer, to political
satirist author to radio host, he said hello to our
Caucasian colleagues Will and the videographer with,
"Hey! You're not Chinese!"
Greg Hugh sits down with Franken first.
HUGH: There's a lot of attention being paid to China
right now because of the Olympics. Minnesota also
recently celebrated twenty-five years [in a Sister City
relationship] with the Shaanxi province in China. What
are some things that you view might affect U.S. and
China's relationship and what you would do about that
when elected?
FRANKEN: We have a very complex relationship with China
that reflects just how complex China is as a country.
China is obviously emerging as a super power.
Economically, China is growing 10 percent a year. I
think last year it was over 11 percent. You see gleaming
skyscrapers in Shanghai, for instance. It has gone from
a communist country to be being a capitalist country but
authoritarian. At the same time of this economic growth
and building military. It is a very fragile super power.
A country that has protest all the time and about a 130
million people living on less than a dollar a day. The
leaders of the communist party now, really its only
justification is to create economic growth for the
country and its people. There's a tremendous amount of
pressure to do so. They are constantly dealing with
discontent in the country-side. You see it as an
emerging super power but it' average per capita GDP is
still very low. As a military power, it doesn't have
more than regional capabilities.
We have an enormous trade deficit with China, which is a
big part of our relationship. China also holds a
tremendous amount of our debt. All of this tension seems
to be growing. Sometimes you're asked where China is
going... I think that is opaque. Not just for people in
American government but also Chinese government. A lot
of their government is being used to hold down civil
strife. People, aside from living in poverty, are also
living in terrible environment conditions. This is a
situation that is evolving. This is 1.3 billion people.
HUGH: There's a growing concern over immigration
difficulties for foreign professionals to obtain H1B
Visas. There are discussions about expanding that
program to bring more talent to the United States. This
trend may reflect on U.S. education. As part of your
domestic program, would you like to improve on education
so we don't have to rely on foreign students or foreign
talent?
FRANKEN: A lot of what you're talking about with the H1
Visas are involving engineers and such. America has
always been successful in bringing in talent. I think
for that purpose, I support the H1B Visas. I think,
though, there needs to be more transparency to it. There
are some companies using H1B Visas to bring in workers
and the question is if they're doing it because they
can't find Americans to do the job, or whether they are
trying to save money. If it's the latter, we shouldn't
be doing it. Americans, especially in the 80's and 90's,
were told if you go to college and master computers,
you'd be set for life. People were expected to pay for
college and put that on themselves but now their jobs
are outsourced to places like India. I've heard people
who have been replaced by people who get H1 Visas and I
think that's wrong. A lot of America traditionally
brought in the smartest people in the world and they
created jobs here. If you look at Silicon Valley
(Calif.), a lot of the jobs there were created by
immigrants. I support expanding H1 Visas but I am also
in support of transparency to make sure these companies
are ethical in their use of H1 Visas.
You're right though that we have to expand our math and
science programs. When I was a kid, Sputnik happened. It
was 1957 and it scared us because the Soviets had
nuclear weapons and they beat us to space. We made a
huge investment in math and science education, and math
and science R&D (research & development). I was a
product of that (era). My brother was also a product of
that (era) and he went to MIT and majored in physics. I
was lucky enough to go to Harvard because I was very
good in math and science. I turned out to be a comedian
but never the less, the innovation that came out of the
space program from the country, it created so many jobs:
It created the computer industry, it created the
internet. I am so much supportive of math and science
education. My son just graduated in mechanical
engineering. I am a big proponent of pulsing that kind
of education.
HUGH: Continuing on the topic of education, Minnesota
has been very progressive in the teaching of Chinese and
Mandarin in the schools. To the extent that there are
quite a few of immersion schools, charter schools doing
that. What is your view on continuing that vein?
FRANKEN: I think anytime we can get American students to
study other languages is a boon. I don't know if you've
noticed, but I think you probably have, we have this
thing called 'globalization.' Hahaha, and I think it's
partly because we have these two oceans. I think it's a
shame. If you go over to Europe, you see kids that speak
multiple languages very fluently. I have a nephew and
niece in Paris that speak Dutch, German, French and
English. We're a melting pot (in the U.S.). We, of all
countries, should be able to have all these people
speaking multiple languages, including obviously
English. We should cultivate the studying of languages
and China will be such an important country in this
century. It'd be crazy not to put emphasis on Chinese.
HUGH: Olympics has drawn a lot
of protests around the world. Is there concern about
U.S. participation?
FRANKEN: I don't think we're going to see a boycott of
the Olympics because of what is happening in Tibet. But
the Chinese are very invested in these Olympics. They
are very proud and this is a signal that China has
emerged. I think we can use the Olympics as leverage to
effect Chinese policy on Tibet. No, we're not going to
boycott but we can protest, our athletes can wear arm
bands or the President can say something when he's over
there. There are things that we can do. It would be nice
to use this as a bargaining chip to get the Chinese
government to stop cracking down on Tibet. I'd love to
see this being used as a way to get the Dali Lama and
Chinese talking.
HUGH: In regard to trade issues, I think in Minnesota's
quarterly statistics China fell in what was being
exported to China. The trade balance is a concern. I
guess the best way to equalize that we need to be able
to export more goods as opposed to import more goods.
FRANKEN: Yes, I guess mathematically it works out. But
the reason for the trade deficit is a number of reasons.
China is the place where goods in Asia go to be
finished. Part of the trade deficit to China reflects
the overall trade deficit in Asia. Another reason is how
the Yuan is under valued. That gives China a tremendous
unfair advantage in trade... if you under value the
Yuan, you are making the Chinese products cheaper than
they should be. The Chinese have also created barriers
to certain kind of products of ours. They have also been
subsidizing such as steel and forestry. We should be
enforcing fair trade. We should also be creating
products that the Chinese want and need. One of those,
in my mind, is clean energy technology. China is
experiencing a great deal of environmental devastation.
China is building one coal fired power plant a week.
This is one of the reasons that I've argued that we
need, in this country, to develop clean coal technology
as something we can sell to China.
HUGH: I know that the department of agriculture is
working with Hormel to trade of all things, turkey.
There's 1.3 billion consumers right there.
FRANKEN: There are a lot of
consumers there. The building of the middle class there
is a building of a perfect storm for the rise and cost
of commodities. Chinese middle class is eating meat. A
lot of it is pork but that means cost of livestock feed
has gone through the roof.
HUGH: Evidently we're going through a period of change
in the United States. Your background is a comedian and
writer. Why have you decided to run for office?
FRANKEN: You're the first to ask me that... no, you're
not. To me it's a very natural transition. I've been a
comedian and comedy writer, as well as a satirist. More
and more I started writing a lot of the political satire
on Saturday Night Live then I started writing books more
pointedly about policy and subsidies. I also did a radio
show that always dealt with policy and issues.
I decided to run (for Senate) because we can't leave
this up to career politicians. I also did not like the
direction of where this country was going in the last
seven years. I think we need to change the political
culture in Washington. We need people who are willing to
stand-up for working families and to special interest
groups. We need politicians and elected officials in
Washington who will say what they mean, stand for
something, fight for what they stand for and not go all
over the place depending on where the people are. We
need someone with a spine. We need a voice for people
who feel like they don't have a voice. I want to be that
kind of Senator.
There is a new progressive majority that has emerged.
We've seen it in the Democrats and the turn out in
Minnesota. In Minnesota, which is a caucus state, the
previous record was 65,000 people. They predicted it
would be a record this year and 215,000 DFL'ers showed
up. There is a new progressive majority that has
emerged. We know what we want. Universal healthcare (for
example). We need this in order to balance our trade
deficit. We spend more on healthcare than any other
industrialized country. It's all in the price of our
products. Secondly, we want an economy that works for
everyone in the country and not just the special
interest and the super rich. We now have the biggest gap
in income and wealth since the 20's and maybe the Gilded
Age. We need better trade agreements. We need to enforce
trade agreements. We need to put in labor standards,
environmental standards and safety standards into our
trade agreements and enforce them. There is certainly a
problem with that in China. We want a green economy that
will create jobs and address global warming and China
fits in there too.
China, like I said, is building one coal fire power
plant a week. We have a President that completely
withdrew from Kyoto. China and India will not go into a
post-Kyoto or second Kyoto agreement if they're looking
at the U.S. and the U.S. isn't doing it. They're saying,
'We're at the point of our industrial revolution and
economic growth. When you were at that point, you were
belching greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Our response is that since then we've discovered better
ways to do this. We've discovered that there is a
problem. China's proper response to that is, 'what are
you doing?' Well, we have to lead. We have to lead in
the fight against global warming. China, who I think is
forward thinking in this issue, is waiting for us to
lead. I think in leading, we can develop technologies
that we can sell to China and India and help our trade
imbalance with China. Also, we want a world class
education for all our kids. That means math and science
and languages.
We want to restore our standing in the world. That means
engaging our allies and advisories. Not only is the
crackdown in Tibet on the table, I think China has been
recalcitrant in Darfur and human rights in its own
country. We have to engage, China, the rest of the
world, China has been very helpful in (North) Korea.
China has been very helpful in (North) Korea to get them
to back off their nuclear arms production.
HUGH: Looking forward and you are elected to the Senate,
do you have an ideal committee that you would like to
serve in?
FRANKEN: I would like to be the chairman of the China
Committee... I'm kidding, hahaha. There is no such
committee. It was a joke. Foreign relations, I want to
be on healthcare, and labor and pensions. I'd like to be
on, Indian affairs. We have a lot of American Indians in
Minnesota and we have a historic debt that has yet to be
addressed. It must be continually addressed. I would
definitely like to be on energy or natural resources in
the environment. Both committees are addressing this
move to a green economy which we and much of the world
is moving to. There are so many committees you would
want to be on. If you're from Minnesota, you'd like to
be on the Agriculture Committee. Minnesota has
historically had someone on the committee. Amy Klobuchar
is on that committee now and so is Norm Coleman. When
Norm Coleman leaves, there will be a spot open for a
Minnesotan. And I want to be on Veteran Affairs because
I don't think we've done right with our veterans.
Greg wraps up his time with Franken and I get to step in
for the remaining few minutes. After having a microphone
affixed, I approach Franken with eagerness. My delight
did not last long. As I stepped towards him, I
accidentally step on his foot.
Mortified, I take my seat with my eyes fixated on his
black polished wing-tipped shoe that I just crushed with
my foot. I slow draw my eyes towards Franken's face and
utter, "I'm so sorry." He laughs heartily as if
understanding the hilarity in the unexpected incident --
small-time kid embarrasses himself in front of
important, well-known, high-standing man. We share a
chuckle and dive into the questions.
LEUNG: Star Tribune recently reported an Education Week
report that rated Minnesota below average in integrating
technology into its school curriculum. As a U.S.
Senator, what can you do to impact that?
FRANKEN: It doesn't surprise me. Our Governor has taken
the position that we're going to have no new taxes in
Minnesota. My argument is that Ronald Regan would be
thrown out of the Republican Party because he raised
taxes many times. But as a result, since integration is
relatively new and we've had this governor for a while
and have had a few governors that haven't invested in
education. It doesn't surprise me at all. As a Senator,
I'm a huge believer in science, community and math.
Again, as I was telling Greg, I was a Sputnik kid. In
1957, Soviets put the first satellite in space. It
scared us because they had nuclear weapons and they were
first in space. So we invested in science, math,
engineering and R&D and created a tremendous innovations
that led to economic booms. To me we need to encourage
that. I will do everything I can to encourage that.
LEUNG: Okay, so I have a real hard-ball question for
you. What is your favorite Chinese food and where do you
have to get that at? Where is your favorite Chinese
restaurant in Minnesota?
FRANKEN: You know, I don't have a favorite Chinese
restaurant. We order out from a place near the office. I
order hot and sour soup a lot. So that's my favorite
dish. Although, I have to say, I am a real sucker for a
great Peking duck. When I went to China, I got a lot of
ducks. I like ducks. You know though, I don't like the
plum sauce. I just eat the duck and I like duck skin.
And so our offices are at 2575, what are we... Southwest
University? Yes, Southwest University (Ave.). So if you
have a really crisp, Peking duck (please deliver). I
really like it with salt too. With the sea salt or burnt
salt. So I just like your plain old duck. I love the
crispy skin. All I want is duck.
LEUNG: I think we need to get him some duck for lunch.
FRANKEN: You know what I liked as a kid? I grew up in
the 50's and 60's. The kind of Chinese food that was
here was all Cantonese. It was just egg foo young and
fried rice. We'd go right at Calhoun. And that was my
favorite. That (restaurant) was The Nanking.
We would go to Calhoun and I remember getting my first
MSG headache. I'm someone who gets headaches. I get
migraines and stuff like that. But this headache was
different because it didn't hurt. It just was, 'Thurt,
thrut. Thrut, thrut.' It was really weird. Do you
remember accent? The seasoning accent? It was just MSG.
Americans would just pour MSG on their anything. But I
remember I just loved egg foo young.
When, I went to college, in Harvard square there was
this place called The Hong Kong. Franny, my wife, is
from Portland, Maine. She had never had Chinese food.
She had her first Chinese meal at The Hong Kong. And of
course, I got egg foo young and fried rice. The thing
is, it's still there and it's still the same stuff.
Whenever we go to Boston, and my daughter went to
Harvard too, we still go to The Hong Kong.